Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mancala networks

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 02:50, 3 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Mancala networks

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable. Philafrenzy (talk) 16:22, 13 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. 16:32, 13 August 2012 (UTC) • Gene93k (talk) 16:32, 13 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. 16:33, 13 August 2012 (UTC) • Gene93k (talk) 16:33, 13 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Strong delete: B2B company with no slightest difference from the generic company of a kind. Awards don't help if there is nothing to write about. — Dmitrij D. Czarkoff (talk) 17:28, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, TheSpecialUser ^TSU 00:45, 20 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 03:21, 27 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Privately held, 3-year-old software company. I could not find any significant coverage at Google News Archive. --MelanieN (talk) 22:58, 2 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.