Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Man of the Year (album) (2nd nomination)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Catfish Jim and the soapdish 23:59, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Man of the Year (album)[edit]

Man of the Year (album) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The album fails WP:GNG and WP:NALBUM. The album did not chart on any country's official chart and was not critically reviewed by any reliable publication.  Versace1608  Wanna Talk? 12:08, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions.  Versace1608  Wanna Talk? 12:09, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Nigeria-related deletion discussions.  Versace1608  Wanna Talk? 12:09, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Spain-related deletion discussions.  Versace1608  Wanna Talk? 12:09, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions.  Versace1608  Wanna Talk? 14:42, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Rayoveto: That's very odd because on the Dareysteel page, someone listed "Dangerous" as his debut album. There seems be controversial information regarding that. Horizonlove (talk) 03:02, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • @Rayoveto:: What criterion of WP:GNG and WP:NALBUM does this article meet, and what "significant reliable sources" are you referring to? You can't just say it meets Wikiepedia's notability requirements without justifying it. You need to justify your argument.  Versace1608  Wanna Talk? 18:19, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ~SS49~ {talk} 00:32, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - First off, it looks unfinished. If that's the case, this page should not have been started until there was more information available. Whoever the creator of the page was, should have did a rough draft. A lot of mandatory contents are missing from this article including track listing, cover art, a release date (not a release year), chart information, etc. One line from the article reads "Man of the Year consists of two tracks, Twerk it and Give it to me". If that's the case, this is not an album but a single, an extended play at best considering that the project title is different from any song in the track list. Unless this is quickly rectified in the article, it fails WP:NALBUM and it would also fail WP:NSINGLE. Also the Rhapsody link is a dead page. Horizonlove (talk) 02:58, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Redirect to Dareysteel, who appears to be just about notable, or if editors feel the search title isn't a viable one, delete. Fails WP:NALBUM – there aren't enough reliable sources to sustain an independent article for the album. Interestingly, although there appear to be several sources from Nigerian newspapers and online websites for the artist, most of them don't appear to be "reliable" and "independent" either... a comparison shows that the wording of the newspaper articles is strikingly similar, suggesting that they were fed a press release, and each newspaper has just altered a few words here and there and then published it. Richard3120 (talk) 15:41, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment: @Horizonlove: the reliable sources used in this article and the article for Dareysteel call the record an album... if that's what the sources call it, it's not up to us to decide if it's a single. Richard3120 (talk) 15:43, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete I don't think an article should be nominated for deletion so soon after the first one closed, but having said that, I can't see any significant coverage for the album, those I can find are just simple announcements. No sourced chart entry either, fails WP:NALBUM. The only question is if it should be redirected, but those searching for Man of the Year are more likely to be looking for some kind of award or a film, few are likely to look for an album by someone barely notable himself. Having it as a redirect is just unnecessary clutter. Hzh (talk) 11:16, 10 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Note to closing Admin: the user page Horizonlove ( IS NOT VERY CLEAR TO ME ) i suspect Sock puppetry --- so i hereby request a proper investigation to Horizonlove before the conclusion of this article debate Rayoveto (talk) 15:32, 10 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Vanamonde (Talk) 23:02, 10 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • @Rayoveto: What are you talking about? I only made a comment regarding article to delete, which I have the right to do if the article has been nominated for deletion. It is highly inappropriate to accuse me of sockpuppetry when you don't have a valid reason to justify your request nor do you have another user to accuse of being my so-called sockpuppet. Nevertheless, you're welcome to open an investigation but you are being highly inappropriate. But if you're accusing me of sockpuppetry because you find my vote and/or comment funny, I would advise you to take a look at my actions on the Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Albums and songs page and then read the Wikipedia:Don't be quick to assume that someone is a sockpuppet. Horizonlove (talk) 01:38, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, EggRoll97 (talk) 05:51, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.