Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Man card
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was Delete --a.n.o.n.y.m t 19:37, 30 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Unsourced article. Possible hoax/original research Hurricane111 15:44, 25 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, WP:NOR. Wikipedia is not a repository for stupid crap, unless it's about pokemon. Proto t c 15:49, 25 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete this rubbish. Flapdragon 16:01, 25 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Nathan Beach 16:45, 25 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete WP:WTF? —simpatico hi 17:22, 25 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, per nom. -Rebelguys2 19:06, 25 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. Latinus 20:21, 25 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per all above. — FREAK OF NURxTURE (TALK) 00:24, Jan. 26, 2006
- I'm going to use up some of my man points to vote that this article be issued the delete card. Doctor Whom 22:32, 26 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment I went ahead and BJAODN'd it. — FREAK OF NURxTURE (TALK) 23:22, Jan. 26, 2006
- Delete: This is a joke from a recent episode of the US television show Scrubs--definitely not noteworthy.
- Delete. --Optichan 20:39, 27 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Does this vote use up points? Nick Catalano (Talk) 08:23, 28 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.