Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mamahuhu

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 12:06, 31 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Mamahuhu[edit]

Mamahuhu (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Provided sources either do not appear to be reliable or do not have significant coverage of the subject. I tried searching for sources, and amusingly it looks like there is a restaurant in San Francisco by this name which may be notable, but I wasn't able to find anything about the website. signed, Rosguill talk 00:22, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. signed, Rosguill talk 00:22, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. signed, Rosguill talk 00:22, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Lightburst (talk) 04:16, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - no indication of notability. -Zanhe (talk) 00:32, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep - Respected sources from Asian, American and many other media that are serious enough. The sources respect the Wikipedia rules, so this article has its place as an article on Wikipedia.. -Susanowoo --Susanowoo (talk) 00:01, 26 January 2020 (UTC) 00:56, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Susanowoo, could you identify which sources you think contribute to GNG? From my view, the ones that have coverage that could be considered significant do not appear to be reliable. signed, Rosguill talk 02:50, 26 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete or perhaps a redirect to Media of China or similar. They do seem to be on the cusp of transitioning from internet notable to IRL notable but they don’t yet appear to satisfy WP:GNG. Horse Eye Jack (talk) 18:58, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.