Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Malik Sumeed

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. $Salvio giuliano$ 20:53, 11 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Malik Sumeed[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Promotional profile of a media advisor with no real indication of notability. Mccapra (talk) 20:49, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Journalism and India. Mccapra (talk) 20:49, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Appears that he works as a journalist for two small news outlets difficult to verify as far as WP:RELY content and factchecking are concerned, Kashmir News Bureau and The Kashmir Scenario. Far from enough for inclusion. Other than that, I was unable to find any other sources that would establish the subject's notability. Ppt91 ^talk 21:02, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, i also go through the article it seems the media outlets are verified and registered, i think this article should be there 2405:201:5502:C2ED:2846:114D:CBB4:5C8A (talk) 06:40, 5 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - UPE/COI article about a non-notable individual. Fails WP:GNG.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 22:48, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
With due respect, Malik has more than 10 year experience in journalism. Keeping in mind that he has worked in small outlets in not justified because he is also been a media advisor (Links attached on page). And first Bollywood journalist from one place. Keeping these points in consideration I request to reverse the decision — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jamat elegits (talk • contribs) 03:40, 5 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Being experience doesn't passes GNG. 𝐋𝐨𝐫𝐝𝐕𝐨𝐥𝐝𝐞𝐦𝐨𝐫𝐭𝟕𝟐𝟖🧙‍♂️^{Let's Talk !} 12:20, 5 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Refactored as I thought the comment from Jamat elegits belonged to the AfD above this one on the log. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 23:06, 5 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Jammu and Kashmir-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 22:29, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as resume. Not much for external articles that cover Sumeed, only passing mentions, press releases, or authored, As for 10 years experience, I have that on Wikipedia, so should I have an article? AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 22:56, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above lacks indepth coverage fails WP:GNG.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 22:51, 10 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep This article is passingWP:GNG. as many verified links are available there.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.