Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Malcolm Adams

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. plicit 12:46, 12 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Malcolm Adams[edit]

Malcolm Adams (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Contested PROD - fails WP:NFOOTBALL due to never playing in a "fully professional league" and WP:GNG due to lack of WP:SIGCOV Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 11:53, 5 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Correct me if I'm wrong but according to Ayr United's official website: "It is a fact that Ayr United engaged solely part time players from 1939 until 1989." So if you wish to pretend they were "fully professional" you will need a source. Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 12:37, 5 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Touché Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 13:38, 5 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - fails GNG and NFOOTBALL. GiantSnowman 19:36, 6 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Leaning Delete but a redirect might be useful (this might have to be to Ayr United itself, because there does not seem to be a list of their players). Certainly not notable enough in the global context for his own entry, and if Scots consider themselves to be European (on which matter I sympathise) they cannot then take advantage of Anglosphere bias as if they were borderline-notable baseball players. RobinCarmody (talk) 14:27, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete The article totally fails GNG.John Pack Lambert (talk) 14:28, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - given that my suggestion that he played in a fully professional league has now been proved wrong, I can no longer make an argument for keeping. Given that he played for 3 different clubs, I would oppose redirecting for now. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 15:30, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Good point. I'm now wholly for Delete here. RobinCarmody (talk) 22:39, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.