Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Malbeth the Seer

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. RL0919 (talk) 04:40, 8 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Malbeth the Seer

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is another non-character. He may have passing reference in the Lord of the Rings, but it may not even by name. Even this article is mainly a coat rack about the implecations of his prophcy, we learn almost nothing of Malbeth himself. There is nothing near the secondary, indepdent sourcing we would need to justify this article. John Pack Lambert (talk) 04:27, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Not-notable. I've been working on List of Middle-earth characters fleshing out descriptions and afding or prodding non-notable figures. You beat me to this one. Hog Farm (talk) 04:56, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom.--Jack Upland (talk) 05:43, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 07:45, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I can only find a few brief mentions of this character in a few journal articles. There appears to be no other coverage of this character. ―Susmuffin ^Talk 14:56, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fantasy-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 15:31, 2 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. The usual Tolkien fancruft with nothing but primary sources. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 08:59, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. The usual Tolkien fancruft with nothing but primary sources. Fails GNG/NFICTION.Kacper IV (talk) 12:15, 5 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.