Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Makoa combatives
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete--Tone 14:50, 29 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Makoa combatives (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
Non-notable martial art. Created by a User with a conflict of interest. Has been speedied once before. Creator keeps removing the speedy tag, and now my speedy tag has been removed by another editor for what I consider uninformed opinion, so here we are. 7 Google hits. Corvus cornixtalk 18:44, 25 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete due to lack of notability.Otolemur crassicaudatus (talk) 19:12, 25 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete I removed the speedy tag because it was incorrectly used, the tag read " Speedy concern: It is an article about a real person that does not indicate the importance or significance of the subject". Now since when has a martial arts system been a real person? As far as I can tell this article is not legitimately covered by any of the CSD criterion, and AfD is the correct venue. RMHED (talk) 21:03, 25 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- db-nn is supposed to apply to all non-notable events, organizations, companies, products, etc. I can't help it that the wording of the tag isn't correct, I used the correct tag. Corvus cornixtalk 21:26, 25 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The template got changed - I have reverted it - [1]. Corvus cornixtalk 21:27, 25 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- db-nn is supposed to apply to all non-notable events, organizations, companies, products, etc. I can't help it that the wording of the tag isn't correct, I used the correct tag. Corvus cornixtalk 21:26, 25 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as being about something which lacks third-party sources unless any care to be provided.--h i s s p a c e r e s e a r c h 21:56, 25 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Beginning with "rare and little known" is a dead giveaway to NN. SkierRMH (talk) 22:16, 25 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.