Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Make Millions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. For now but ping me or drop me a note if you find sources Spartaz Humbug! 07:49, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note that I have restored this per sources provided st [1]. Please start a new discussion if you disagree. Spartaz Humbug! 15:33, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Make Millions[edit]

Make Millions (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article does not assert its notability through third party reliable sources. Yes, this game is from 1984 and most sources will be offline so harder to locate, but atm I can't see any. Coin945 (talk) 08:03, 1 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. Happy New Year!!! Babymissfortune 08:38, 1 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Happy New Year!!! Babymissfortune 08:38, 1 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Happy New Year!!! Babymissfortune 08:39, 1 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Commment This one is a tough one, due to the fact that it's from 1984, and was released really early in the Macs lifespan (Mac was also released in 1984). I can't find online sources, and there is no mention on MobyGames, but maybe someone who's a bit cleverer with archives might find something. Lee Vilenski(talk) 11:04, 4 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 19:28, 8 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Yunshui  10:14, 15 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as unable to establish notability through multiple reliable sources. There maybe some old magazines that covered it but I did a metadata search on archive.org which didn't turn up anything fruitful. Mattg82 (talk) 23:24, 15 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.