Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Make.org
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Arbitrarily0 (talk) 03:45, 18 January 2024 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Make.org (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This forum has received no coverage from independent sources, failing WP:GNG. NotAGenious (talk) 08:53, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Law, Websites, and Europe. NotAGenious (talk) 08:55, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions. A. B. (talk • contribs • global count) 02:36, 5 January 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 08:18, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
- Delete. I'm also unable to find any coverage of this organization at all other than their own webpage. Rehsarb (talk) 13:22, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
- Delete I did find a page from MIT, but it was a simple listing. Nothing I could find to disprove WP:GNG failure. RetroCosmos talk 13:25, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Check Axel Dauchez but doesn't look like there is enough related to it IgelRM (talk) 04:06, 15 January 2024 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.