Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Majken Haugedal

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to List of Playboy Playmates of 1968. Clear redirect case per precedent and consensus. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 09:48, 3 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Majken Haugedal[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable. No sources found Fasttimes68 (talk) 05:47, 1 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect - I believe the precedent on Playboy centerfolds has been redirection to annual lists of the same, outside of the handful that meet GNG through other activities.. This seems to have worked fine. Carrite (talk) 06:09, 1 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect fails WP:GNG & WP:PORNBIO Fasttimes68 (talk) 20:01, 1 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:14, 2 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:18, 2 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect. While I gave this one a pass when I performed my first round of redirects, the community consensus in the later group of Playmate AFDs took a slightly more stringent line. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 03:28, 3 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.