Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Majiziya Bhanu

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. There is consensus that the subject is notable by WP:GNG. This might also have been eligible for a speedy keep per WP:SK#1, with the nominator deleting a copy-pasted nomination rational shortly after creating this AfD page. (non-admin closure) — MarkH₂₁^talk 17:55, 24 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Majiziya Bhanu[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2021 April 17. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 07:22, 17 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 08:35, 17 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 08:35, 17 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bodybuilding-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 08:35, 17 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 08:35, 17 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: Loads of coverage of her from before this Big Boss thing, focussed on her powerlifting and wearing of the hijab: [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8], [9], [10], [11]. I don't know what the rules are for bodybuilders specifically, but I think she's passed the general notability rules. Would consider draftifying until revised into a full article. Furius (talk) 11:42, 18 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Strong Keep: The nominator hasnt even given a proper reason for this nomination. Also something suspicious has happened to the article. After the nom Bilal.Choudary2 nominated the article for deletion, an IP came and blanked some section of the article just after 3 minutes. I dont know whether it is a coinincidence or something well planned. The subject is the first Hijabi powerlifiter from Kerala. The sources in the article are giving enough in-depth coverage to the article. If someone is not satisfied with the sigcov, please ping me. I can provide more Malayalam sources here. Regards. Kichu🐘 ^{Need any help?} 00:18, 19 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Kerala-related deletion discussions. Kichu🐘 ^{Need any help?} 04:37, 19 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: Easy pass of WP:GNG. Sonofstar (talk) 10:22, 19 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I started revising the article to incorporate information from multiple in-depth sources; clearly meets WP:GNG. Beccaynr (talk) 22:35, 20 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.