Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Maitresse Madeline
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete. No arguments for keeping in three weeks. Michig (talk) 09:15, 2 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Maitresse Madeline (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Wretchedly promotional, poorly sourced BLP. Subject fails WP:PORNBIO, WP:ENT, and the GNG. No nontrivial GNews or GBooks hits. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 19:08, 10 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:32, 11 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:33, 11 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: Fails PORNBIO, ANYBIO and GNG. Cavarrone (talk) 21:34, 11 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —Tom Morris (talk) 08:58, 18 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, BusterD (talk) 02:00, 26 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: Relisted twice with no notability shown. SL93 (talk) 17:02, 26 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.