Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mahnaz Badihian

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 01:01, 19 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Mahnaz Badihian[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Deleted via PROD in 2017, contested at my user page. Restoring for community discussion. I didn't find much in the way of sources except this short article from the virtual US-Iran Embassy, so I'm leaning delete, but maybe there's sources in Farsi I didn't see. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 10:06, 4 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Poetry-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 10:09, 4 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 10:09, 4 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Maryland-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 10:10, 4 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Iowa-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 10:11, 4 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Oregon-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 10:11, 4 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Iran-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 10:12, 4 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete inadequate sources to show notability.John Pack Lambert (talk) 20:38, 4 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ceethekreator (talk) 20:34, 11 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I do not see the coverage needed to meet WP:GNG. I also don't see that she meets WP:NAUTHOR. Papaursa (talk) 23:43, 17 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.