Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mahalakshmi (Kannada actress)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Ben · Salvidrim! ✉ 18:24, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Mahalakshmi (Kannada actress)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

~~Fails WP:BLP, WP:GNG. No reliable sources provided here. -- HindWiki^Connect 16:02, 2 January 2018 (UTC)~~ — HindWIKI (talk • contribs) is a confirmed sock puppet of Singer Jethu Sisodiya (talk • contribs). – Struck above comment from blocked sock per WP:SOCKSTRIKE. Sam Sailor 17:04, 7 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. PriceDL (talk) 17:04, 2 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. PriceDL (talk) 17:04, 2 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. PriceDL (talk) 17:04, 2 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. PriceDL (talk) 17:05, 2 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep for now: Within a span of an hour that it was created, the nom has AfD'd this article. I do think we need to give some more time to see if this can establish notability. — LeoFrank ^Talk 17:09, 2 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The article is about a person who was a recognized actress, performing lead roles in more than 50 films in Kannada film industry. Necessary citations, links to the articles(movies worked on), and linkbacks from articles(movies worked on), and even external links(confirming the person was an actress) and article-neutrality, are present. Can anybody please throw some light on any missing tags? Or any tags should be excluded? Thank you. -- Ganeshprasadkp (talk) 3 January 2018 (UTC)
@Ganeshprasadkp: Please go through WP:BIO and WP:GNG to improve the article further. FYI, recognized person does not implicitly become notable enough for an article to exist on their name. — LeoFrank ^Talk 06:24, 3 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

*Comment - If this page can be improved then we can nominate it for WP:PROD And if there are no corrections and improvement in these seven days, the administers will delete it. What you say? -- HindWiki^Connect 13:22, 3 January 2018 (UTC) — HindWIKI (talk • contribs) is a confirmed sock puppet of Singer Jethu Sisodiya (talk • contribs). – Struck above comment from blocked sock per WP:SOCKSTRIKE. Sam Sailor 17:04, 7 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

No because PROD (and yes CSD) are for uncontroversial deletions. This is clearly not uncontroversial. My own vote is for keep as it appears that an actress in so many films will have the outcome of being notable. Egaoblai (talk) 00:15, 4 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 00:34, 5 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.