Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mah Sing Group

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. (WP:NPASR). North America1000 20:44, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Mah Sing Group[edit]

Mah Sing Group (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I'm not sure if this is notable as my searches here, here (some of the same results but ranged farther), here, here and here found nothing that seems significant and notable. A press release here named them one of the best companies to work for in Asia for 2013 but that won't save the article. The article and company's website says it was founded in 1965 but this must be inaccurate then because it says "18th anniversary". Any comments? SwisterTwister talk 16:59, 21 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Malaysia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:58, 23 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:58, 23 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Davewild (talk) 19:59, 28 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment - @SwisterTwister This one puzzles me a little bit. I see tons of sources, but not sure if they all relate to the same company. It develops real estate and manufactures plastics and if you remove the "Berhad" from the Google search, you return these results [1]. I think if we can verify that it is publicly traded, I would be willing to leave a keep vote. Thoughts? --TTTommy111 (talk) 21:07, 28 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 18:34, 4 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment It's indeed publicly traded at the Malaysian Stock Exchange, stock sign MSGB:MK according to Bloomberg or MAHS.KL according to Reuters. Kraxler (talk) 16:40, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.