Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Magroor (1950 film)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Beeblebrox (talk) 06:49, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Magroor (1950 film)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Google search fails to find reliable sources for 1950 film. It finds the 1979 film, but that is not the same, and it finds the 1950 film in IMDB, but that is not a third-party reliable source. As a result, does not pass film notability. Robert McClenon (talk) 14:54, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:26, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:26, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I have found (by searching google/books 'Magroor, 1950 film') this which has the film title, director and year matching the article. Nothing from a reliable source that appears to satisfy WP:NF. Happy to reconsider if better sources are found. Gab4gab (talk) 20:49, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

just added another reliable link which contains film info and orignal poster of Magroor 1950 film. regards --Rockyleo94 (talk) 13:41, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Thanks for the update. The new source, cinestaan.com, and HindiGeetMala.net both appear to be indiscriminate collections of film data similar to imdb. Because they will include any film they contribute very little to notability. What they contain about this film is just basic film facts plus video or images. No plot summaries. No critical commentary. The third source, memsaabstory, is a personal blog which is not considered a reliable source. A stated goal of the blog is to cover films that have received little coverage elsewhere. Not a helpful policy for showing notability if it was a reliable source. Gab4gab (talk) 15:29, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comment thanks for a helpful reply i just added another link plz do check it. regards

--Rockyleo94 (talk) 17:48, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comment The new link is to osianama.com which has collected art connected to films in a database. Seems to be another collection of every film that has associated art (posters). Inclusion of a particular film would not an indication of notability. Gab4gab (talk) 19:48, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.