Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Magnitude (Album)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy delete a9, album by nonnotable artist with no article. NawlinWiki (talk) 16:35, 16 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Magnitude (Album)

Not notable ~~song~~ album must have been asleep by non notable band. Don't recall a speedy category for albums. Dloh cierekim 02:13, 16 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Myspace is not verifiable, myspace is a total social network.--Free way 8 02:31, 16 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. -- TwentiethApril1986 (want to talk?) 02:51, 16 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete--article is unreferenced and (was) poorly written, album is not yet out, band is not notable. Thus, delete. Drmies (talk) 02:54, 16 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, a non-notable album by a non-notable band. Esradekan Gibb ^"Talk" 13:40, 16 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete This is exactly why I want a new speedy criterion for albums by red link bands. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP)} 13:55, 16 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Not a good sign when I can't find anything about the band on BillBoard or Allmusic. Cheers, Dloh cierekim 14:00, 16 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A9 Yay, new speedy criterion. So tagged. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP)} 16:10, 16 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.