Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Magnetotrama

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 17:31, 27 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Magnetotrama[edit]

Article is original research with no refs or secondary sources, and hence no WP:Verifiability. If covered in medical research it would be OK, but not as a personal reminiscence. TrulyBlue (talk) 19:31, 22 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Violates WP:NOR and the only way to confirm might violate WP:COS. Vrefron (talk) 20:02, 22 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete The article if you can call it that simply states one persons observations after an accident, with some other info. It is definitely falls under WP:NOR. SOL Basic 01:41, 23 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Original research in the extreme:the personal trauma of the author of the article in an accident with an eraser for recording tape! Not something in the medical textbooks or journals. Wikipedia is not a site to write about our incidents in life and our analyses and hypotheses of them.Edison2 (talk) 03:18, 23 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Ugh. Delete, per nom. -- Vary | Talk 23:12, 23 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Comment some cites have been given, but they do not relate to trauma: see my comments on the talk page. TrulyBlue (talk) 09:03, 24 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Cites don't mention it for the most part, and the whole thing is WP:OR. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP)} 16:00, 24 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.