Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Magic Logix (2nd nomination)
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. There was no need for a 2nd relist here. TonyBallioni (talk) 02:37, 24 November 2017 (UTC)
AfDs for this article:
- Magic Logix (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
An advertorially toned page on an unremarkable private company. Significant RS coverage not found. What comes up is PR-driven or WP:SPIP. Does not meet WP:CORP and WP:CORPDEPTH. First AfD closed as "delete" in 2012. Separately, the article on the company's CEO has recently been deleted: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hassan Bawab. K.e.coffman (talk) 02:05, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. K.e.coffman (talk) 02:05, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Texas-related deletion discussions. North America1000 05:49, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Bushranger One ping only 03:05, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Bushranger One ping only 03:05, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
- Delete As per OP above, references fail the criteria for establishing notability, fails WP:CORPDEPTH and/or WP:ORGIND. -- HighKing++ 17:05, 16 November 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, KagunduTalk To Me 01:43, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, KagunduTalk To Me 01:43, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.