Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Maelyn Jarmon

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎ . Less Unless (talk) 16:49, 26 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Maelyn Jarmon[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Coverage, both here and about the internet, focuses solely on her part on The Voice (American season 16). Aside from some less-than-impressive charting singles, most of which also come from her time on the show, I don't see independent notability at this time. Merge/redirect to the season page. See also Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wait for You (Maelyn Jarmon song). QuietHere (talk | contributions) 21:18, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians, Women, Television, and Texas. QuietHere (talk | contributions) 21:18, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep She charted #6 on the Digital chart, that's not nothing. One Other single charted in the top 20 on the same chart, that's notability. Oaktree b (talk) 00:32, 3 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
On the digital chart, sure, but with zero placements on the Hot 100 that it feeds into. It's not nothing but I'm not convinced it's much of something, and without much else to match it, I still don't see the keep. Besides, that's info that can still be merged easily. QuietHere (talk | contributions) 01:04, 3 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The point is that she got #6, it doesn't mater what you think will happen after said occasion. PaulGamerBoy360 (talk) 00:03, 24 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, $Salvio giuliano$ 23:02, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I think her notability is recognizable with chart topping singles. The article mentions noteworthy statistics that a redirect could not. 2603:9001:1B02:FB65:1182:B2D5:A51C:9565 (talk) 23:51, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Courcelles (talk) 13:19, 17 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep- everything said in here and the article points towards keeping it. PaulGamerBoy360 (talk) 00:04, 24 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: Charts on the US Digital Song Sales make this eligible for WP:MUSICBIO #2. Jalen Folf (talk) 02:02, 24 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.