Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Maelcum Soul

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. notability established through article improvements. 78.26 _{(spin me / revolutions)} 17:16, 29 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Maelcum Soul

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete: as non-notable actress. Three credits at IMDb. Rest of article is COI-generated. Quis separabit? 15:16, 14 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 04:09, 15 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 04:09, 15 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Maryland-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 04:09, 15 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

~~Delete~~ The article gives no indication of meeting any WP notability criteria and my own search didn't find anything I believe shows that WP:GNG or any SNG is met. Papaursa (talk) 02:34, 21 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Article has been improved, so I have reconsidered my original vote (as I said I would below). Papaursa (talk) 18:11, 22 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

comment not sure if she meets GNG or not...but a search on Newspapers.com shows a few sources, and there may be others using other variations of name. I didn't get a chance to add any to the article but others may want to look into newspaper archives. Thsmi002 (talk) 02:38, 21 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

What I found was her name mentioned in articles concerning John Waters. Didn't think that was enough to meet WP:GNG, more like WP:NOTINHERITED, but if someone finds better coverage I will reconsider my vote. Papaursa (talk) 02:50, 21 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the Article Rescue Squadron's list of content for rescue consideration. Thsmi002 (talk) 14:21, 21 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

comment In 2007, someone commented on Talk:Maelcum_Soul, "Am I the only one who thinks these various slim "Dreamlander" articles should perhaps be grouped into one page?" Maybe on the end of Dreamlanders with a redirect? StrayBolt (talk) 18:19, 21 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Passes WP:ENTERTAINER and there are obvious alternatives to deletion. Andrew D. (talk) 21:27, 21 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per WP:HEYMANN. Soul passes WP:ENTERTAINER due to lead roles in films, serving as the artist model for a widely reported exhibition, and for the cult following/unique influence on the art scene of Baltimore. I added to the article with new sources. Thsmi002 (talk) 00:18, 22 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Steve Smith (talk) 08:28, 22 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: notability now seems established. PamD 08:48, 22 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep The article has been greatly improved. [1] Notability established. Dream Focus 17:00, 22 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Thsmi002. I also added an article where Waters says she was a big influence on him and his makeup artist. Megalibrarygirl (talk) 17:33, 22 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.