Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Madisen hill
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 06:10, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Madisen hill (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:N, no WP:RS cited. Delete Basket of Puppies 07:13, 31 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Madisen gets a lot of coverage, she meets WP:BIO. She was also a former Miss Missouri teen. [1]. Also this girl hangs with Miley Cyrus! She performs everywhere and is very news worthy! Sorry if this is in the wrong format. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.90.57.104 (talk) 07:32, 31 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per the reasons listed by the anon. IP above. sixtynine • spill it • 07:53, 31 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. Also, I swing the ten pound hammer at your "upcoming debut album." --SquidSK (1MC•log) 07:56, 31 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep This girl is an amazing performer and role model to young children. If you do a search she is everywhere. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.58.138.66 (talk) 09:11, 31 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: I can't find significant coverage for this person. Joe Chill (talk) 14:03, 31 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Not yet notable for anything. Although the article claims she's worked on numerous shows, etc., IMDb indicates she was a (non-featured) dancer at an awards show and is involved in a sketchy upcoming project. Maybe in the future. Glenfarclas (talk) 19:22, 31 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 20:14, 31 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 20:14, 31 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: Not notable. Evalpor (talk) 05:13, 1 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete apparently even the article's creator didn't think she was notable enough to capitalize her last name. Handschuh-talk to me 11:16, 1 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. She may become notable in the future, but I can not find in-depth coverage in reliable sources to suggest this article meets WP:BIO at this time. Gongshow Talk 19:19, 1 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Searched her, found great interviews/coverage. Awesome performer.--Teamlulu (talk) 20:16, 1 January 2010 (UTC) — Teamlulu (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]
- Keep Lots of newsworthy items. Great songs. Many new projects scheduled for release in 2010.--24.107.113.63 (talk) 20:42, 1 January 2010 (UTC) — 24.107.113.63 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]
- Comment does anyone else smell a sock? --SquidSK (1MC•log) 00:58, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- This AfD is being carpet bombed by socks. Whoever "Madisen hill" is, she either has a lot of free time or a very devoted fan. Enigmamsg 21:36, 6 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment does anyone else smell a sock? --SquidSK (1MC•log) 00:58, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - fails WP:ENT; socking here seems to be a concern. An unreleased album and some appearances in commercials, etc. don't lead her over the notability threshold. Cocytus [»talk«] 04:10, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete fails notability for an entertainer. And as a note to 76.90.57.104, hanging with someone doesn't count as notability. --Bejnar (talk) 06:17, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete fails to meet WP:ENT. RichardLowther (talk) 13:54, 5 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom and per keep votes. "Awesome performer" and "hangs with Miley Cyrus" are not reasons to keep. Enigmamsg 20:09, 5 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
KEEP Madisen has shown great growth already in her career. She knows what she wants and is going for it. She aims to please! No matter what she will keep pressing on! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Pinkie2381 (talk • contribs) 16:12, 6 January 2010 (UTC) — Pinkie2381 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.