Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Madhurima Tuli

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. SarahStierch (talk) 19:08, 22 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Madhurima Tuli[edit]

Madhurima Tuli (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable actor with non-notable roles. Weak refs for a WP:BLP ES&L 10:19, 2 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 11:39, 2 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 11:40, 2 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - no need for an AfD...--Stemoc (talk) 12:15, 2 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Why don't we speedy FA it? §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 15:11, 3 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
My Speedy Delete still stands, she is not notable, to an extent she could pass basic as most of her roles were minor and for films where she had "major" roles, those films were low-budgeted movies. Her only major film would be "Warning". Not good enough IMO...--Stemoc (talk) 23:07, 14 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Well... its hardly speedy after these many days. And budgets have nothing to do. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 04:16, 15 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Heh, true, still voting delete though, I do not want a benchmark set here in regards to "indian celebrities" or what qualifies as Indian celebrity, I have seen some recognised B-List Hollywood actors not having wikipedia articles.. basic requirements for Indian stars seems to be lower compared to American/British cinema ones....and i have seen a few of those movies listed above for Tuli, barely any screen presence..heck Razak Khan is way more notable than her ;) + also i merged her IMDb pages, should be merged into one within 3 days...--Stemoc (talk) 04:29, 15 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep per substantial coverage in reliable independent sources. Starring roles in film and television roles. NOt sure what the issue is? Candleabracadabra (talk) 13:26, 2 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Maaricha and Nimbe Huli are other two film with her lead role. And add to that other many films and TV series in which she has played supporting roles. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 05:38, 10 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. Meets WP:NACTOR. I have updated the filmography with five productions, and made a rewrite with a bit of chronology. Budgets say little about notability; The Element of Crime was made for less than 1 mill USD. --Sam Sailor Sing 01:52, 15 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 17:50, 11 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Removing AfD nominator name from ping edit above as they find it "disruptive" to call them here but are completely okay with disrupting article spaces with unnecessary AfD tags. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 15:48, 14 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Nice work Sam Sailor. I hadn't looked for alternative spelling as "Madurima Tulli". §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 04:16, 15 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Per a) User:Dharmadhyaksha, b) the citations added in the article, c) she is a television actress and model too. Passes GNG. --TitoDutta 13:01, 15 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.