Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Madera Country Club Estates, California (2nd nomination)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Liz Read! Talk! 20:31, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Madera Country Club Estates, California[edit]

Madera Country Club Estates, California (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable housing development/subdivision within Madera Acres, California fails GEOLAND Reywas92Talk 20:59, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Geography and California. Reywas92Talk 20:59, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep, I went and added some sources about this place from a few newspapers. The area is notable for being part of a real estate boom in the 1960's and 1970's. Dr vulpes (💬📝) 23:24, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete yeah Reywas92 is right this isn't notable. Dr vulpes (💬📝) 05:04, 20 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    Besides MOS:DECADE, I maintain that routine local coverage of housing development doesn't mean the individual development is notable, especially when it's within an existing community with an article; better to have a history section in Madera Acres, California than to suggest a subdivision like the one I grew up in needs its own article. Reywas92Talk 23:21, 16 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete See my comments on River Road Estates, above. Lots of places had real-estate booms in the 1960s and 1970s; if that's our standard for notability then pretty much every housing development built in those years is notable. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 00:12, 16 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.