Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Madeenathul Uloom Arabic College

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 16:41, 9 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Madeenathul Uloom Arabic College[edit]

Madeenathul Uloom Arabic College (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Advertising, marketing or public relations • ArtsRescuer 09:11, 18 May 2016 (UTC) ArtsRescuer (talkcontribs) is a confirmed sock puppet of Shafinusri (talkcontribs). [reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Sir Joseph (talk) 15:05, 18 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:11, 18 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Redirect to University of Calicut, of which it is affiliated. Bearian (talk) 19:24, 19 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. Appears to be a degree-awarding institution and is affiliated to a recognised university. Just because an Indian college is affiliated to a university doesn't mean it's part of it - such institutions are independent, separate, and usually given their own articles. Not advertising in any way. -- Necrothesp (talk) 14:30, 23 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, st170etalk 01:35, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Islam-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 15:49, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, st170etalk 00:25, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.