Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mad Ghost Productions

This discussion was subject to a deletion review on 2020 January 25.
For an explanation of the process, see Wikipedia:Deletion review.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Geoff Johns. Rough consensus that notability is not met, and notability cannot be inherited. As there seems a rough agreement amongst the commenting eds that redirecting to founder seems logical, and no inherent disagreement from nom a redirect seems appropriate. As the article doesn't seem miles from satisfying notability, this may also aid any eventual recreation (non-admin closure) Nosebagbear (talk) 14:38, 16 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Mad Ghost Productions[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete Notability is not inherited and while some of the films and tv series are notable, as is the founder, the company itself does not appear to be. References fail the criteria for establishing notability, topic fails GNG and WP:NCORP. HighKing⁺⁺ 19:29, 9 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 01:37, 10 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 01:37, 10 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 01:38, 10 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 01:38, 10 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Geoff Johns. It's a valid search term and his article has some info on it. Argento Surfer (talk) 12:49, 10 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Johns' page as per above comment. I did find some additional sourcing but I do not disagree with nom's rationale. It's not notable yet. If Johns' page doesn't have the info, it should be merged there as well as redirected. Etzedek24 ^{(I'll talk at ya) (Check my track record)} 21:19, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.