Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Machine (Exo song)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. —Cryptic 13:49, 25 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Machine (Exo song)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Song fails WP:GNG. Once again, this is a song from Exo's Mama (EP), every single track of which was given an article on Wikipedia. The song was not a single, was not released promotionally, has no music video, and received no significant coverage by reliable, independent sources. Of the sources listed, thrr are record reviews by the typical kpop fan machine (of the entire EP, not independently of this song), three are people's profile pages (not articles), and one is a youtube video belonging to the artist. Shinyang-i (talk) 14:18, 2 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Korea-related deletion discussions. Shinyang-i (talk) 14:20, 2 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:15, 2 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Merge to Mama (EP): Not even a hit single that charted. Tibbydibby (talk) 21:46, 2 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete no independent notability Asdklf; (talk) 22:32, 2 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NORTH AMERICA¹⁰⁰⁰ 16:14, 9 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ^BE _CK ^Y _SA ^{Y L}E _S 07:58, 17 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete fails WP:GNG. Teaser section is unnecessary. Allkpop is a fanblog, not a real review.--TerryAlex (talk) 20:16, 18 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Insufficient (no) coverage in reliable sources to support notability. ^BE _CK ^Y _SA ^{Y L}E _S 04:54, 25 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above deletion debate is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either this nomination or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.