Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mac Clark (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 11:26, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Mac Clark

AfDs for this article:

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This was deleted as the result of an AfD, but treated as an expired prod. Less than 2 weeks later it was recreated. Nothing has changed since the AfD. Pinging users who were involved in the first discussion: Agtx, Jovanmilic97, and GhostOfDanGurney. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 16:22, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not sure why the link to the first discussion didn't transclude. Here it is: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mac Clark Onel5969 ^{TT me} 16:24, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Motorsport, and Canada. Shellwood (talk) 16:36, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Mentions on a few different websites, nothing for RS. Toronto Star article is about the only RS I can see, something on sportsnet but it comes up as a 404 site. Still delete. Oaktree b (talk) 17:44, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Weak delete - Is the subject of a new fluff piece published on Inside Track News [1]. Despite going above and beyond mere WP:ROUTINE reporting, I have concerns about its independence as the piece appears to have been written by an agency called "Speed Group". This "Speed Group" lists James Hinchcliffe as a "partner" and the article does mention the subject as being a "protégé" of Hinchcliffe. If other editors feel this is independent enough, then we have 2 sources meeting GNG and we can keep this. Otherwise, delete. -"Ghost of Dan Gurney" 06:52, 4 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - I also invite Formula Downforce to this discussion, as the edit history shows that they challenged the soft deletion. -"Ghost of Dan Gurney" 06:58, 4 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Draftify - I do think that winning a rung of the Road to Indy ladder does make him notable but even if there's not enough coverage about him yet his article should be kept as a draft because he's likely to become more notable in the near future. Formula Downforce (talk) 16:49, 4 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Fails WP:NSPORT and WP:SIGCOV. WP:SALT to prevent recreation.4meter4 (talk) 05:36, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.