Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MPEG Video Wizard DVD

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Cirt (talk) 01:03, 2 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

MPEG Video Wizard DVD

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unremarkable software. Lacks significant coverage in 3rd party sources. Contested prod. RadioFan (talk) 04:07, 25 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. — Gongshow ^Talk 04:18, 25 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: Per [1], [2], and [3]. Joe Chill (talk) 15:57, 25 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: Per [4], [5], [6], [7], [8], [9]and [10]Wikierofc (talk) 07:15, 26 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Comment The first set of links are largely in German from websites I'm not familiar with, can someone else weigh in on their reliability? Are they blogs or are they associated with known publications? The second set of links includes some blogs, shareware directories, and websites that appear to be based around forums. In short it's not clear how the above links establish the notability of this software. Some additional comments from Wikierofc and/or Joe Chill as well as any other editor who is more familiar with these sources would be helpful.--RadioFan (talk) 12:57, 26 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Those are reliable sources de:Computer Bild, ru:iXBT.com, and even Softonic reviews are okay. I've not heard of videoforums.co.uk; the reviews there are written by amateurs (click "about me") , but they look ok to use as additional source in the article. The other sites listed here are probably not WP:RS. Pcap ping 17:50, 1 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.