Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MOTH
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was no consensus; default keep. Johnleemk | Talk 12:11, 18 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Not encyclopedic. Does not make claims the appear to satisfy WP:MUSIC, I am unable to confirm that they do: neither Songs for the Earth nor Back from the Dead Google well enough to demonstrate notability, no allmusic entry that I could find. Delete unless more evidence provided. brenneman(t)(c) 03:50, 12 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - should be A7-able. --Jeffrey O. Gustafson - Shazaam! - <*> 10:09, 12 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, redirect to Moth for the benefit of AOL users. Proto t c 10:51, 12 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Can't we just teach AOL users to capitalize properly, or am I missing something? - Mgm|(talk) 12:45, 12 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- weak Keep Found a few references such as [1], [2] [3]. Note that the same article is at Moth band. -- Astrokey44|talk 12:36, 12 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak Keep Per Astrokey. The seem to weakly meet the WP:MUSIC as a specialist act since they claim to be sometimes featured on UK Christian radio, and they have a band member from a notable group. Though we don't need the same page twice, so we should "Speedy Delete" the mirror page. In fact the best name for this page is probably Moth (band), since the all caps is not their normal name, Moth band is not clear and Moth is taken by the bug. Obina 22:51, 12 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- WP:MUSIC says "Contains [..] member [from] a band that is otherwise extremely notable" (emphasis mine). Additionally, for "performers outside of mass media traditions" it asks for citations for being influential in style, establishing a tradition, etc. This doesn't qulaify. - brenneman(t)(c) 23:21, 12 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.