Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MORE Electric and Power Corporation

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:52, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

MORE Electric and Power Corporation[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Philippine power utility company serving one province. Coverage sourced to routine company announcements, company owned media. Fails WP:CORPDEPTH, WP:NCORP. Alexandermcnabb (talk) 07:18, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and Philippines. Alexandermcnabb (talk) 07:18, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Seems to me that more news sources (beyond routine press releases) exist. For example this report and this report about a parliamentary debate and this report about a Supreme Court case. JMWt (talk) 07:44, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to List of electric distribution utilities in the Philippines, where it is mentioned. —hueman1 (talk • contributions) 11:59, 14 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Meets WP:NCORP with sources presented by JMWT, including the ones in the article. They're reliable enough, with most of them being in-depth IMV. SBKSPP (talk) 00:36, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: per SBKSPP. SeanJ 2007 (talk) 07:43, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:40, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: @Liz: Why did you relist the discussion? There are 2 keeps and 1 redirect. SeanJ 2007 (talk) 09:04, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

First, SeanJ 2007, a deletion discussion is not a Vote. Plus, not all votes are counted equally, that's why it's not a vote count. Additionally, a Keep opinion is different from a Redirect. Finally, there is an editor advocating Deletion, the nominator. There is definitely no consensus on how this discussion should close. If you feel differently, well, maybe you should consider having an RFA for yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:57, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. The deeds of this company are significant enough to those within its service area that there's ample press about what it's doing and how it affects its community. Nearly every action it takes is reported in local press, CNN Philippines, and others. FalconK (talk) 21:02, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per others Goodvibes500 (talk • contribs) 01:19, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.