Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MOFAT Diamond Scandal

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 11:47, 17 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

MOFAT Diamond Scandal[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

What is not Wikipedia Jab843 (talk) 16:47, 2 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Korea-related deletion discussions.

Keep. I'm not sure that the nomination really presents a case for deletion, simply by referencing that Wikipedia is not a newspaper. The incident seems to have attracted substantial coverage in multiple reliable sources in Korea. More context would surely be helpful for non-Koreans. - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 17:25, 2 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:50, 3 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Armbrust, B.Ed. ^{Let's talk}_{about my edits?} 18:56, 9 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep and expand further. A google news search shows that this is really big in Korea. Trying to fit this into politicians' articles could potentially lead to undue weight in their BLPs. (This would actually be a good one for the WP:ARS.) Mark Arsten (talk) 17:10, 10 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.