Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MNSi
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was DELETE. Mo0[talk] 16:31, 18 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Articles doesn't establish notability under WP:CORP and ends up sounding like an advertisement. --Alan Au 23:07, 13 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Delete Not notable, per nom. BTW I am Canadian!!! Mike 00:09, 14 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Article has little/no meaningful content. Mike 01:30, 15 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment "Not notable, per nom." is not currently a criterion for speedy deletion. Please clarify to indicate which of these criteria you feel the page meets, or revise your vote. Stifle 00:47, 15 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Creator's Rebuttal — I highly doubt it's spam, since i referenced my work and have used it, AND Jet2.net as my ISPs in the past. I feel it should be kept, for the reason of it being a legitimate canadian company. Raccoon Fox 23:49, 13 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- There are no references, external links etc. Mike 04:09, 15 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete if not improved - my stance on it, and Jet2.net. Raccoon Fox 01:53, 14 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete -- Krash 18:54, 14 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - I removed the advertisingish language, but don't know enough about the company to judge its notability. - Jaysus Chris 19:01, 14 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as unverifiable, for the moment. Stifle 00:47, 15 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete of not improved or varified - • Dussst • T | C 19:09, 17 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]- Keep I have added some information about the company using its website. I now think it is a lot more productive than many stubs that aren't up for deletion - • Dussst • T | C 16:01, 18 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.