Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MKE (tabloid)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. MBisanz ^talk 03:19, 10 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

MKE (tabloid)

~~Delete~~ Merge with Journal Communications. Not notable & has no third party, verifiable sources to boot. SERSeanCrane (talk) 23:49, 6 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Much appreciated sourcing/re-write by Orange Mike, but I'm not convinced the tabloid requires its own article (WP:CORP).SERSeanCrane (talk) 03:57, 8 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of News-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 05:03, 7 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Wisconsin-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 05:03, 7 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - I've added references and background, establishing it in context as part of the (unsuccessful) efforts of establishment media monopolies and near-monopolies to poach on their hipper competition. --Orange Mike | Talk 22:58, 7 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per excellent improvements by Orangemike. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 03:41, 8 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Seems to meet all qualifications for a small article. It'll probably never be more than a stub, but that's ok too. — BQZip01 — ^talk 23:16, 8 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.