Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MIPSel

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to MIPS architecture. MBisanz ^talk 00:19, 30 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

MIPSel

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't assert notability with reliable sources. ❤ Yutsi ^Talk/ Contributions ( 偉特 ) 01:15, 21 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:48, 21 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete; I found no RS's. – Ypnypn (talk) 23:54, 21 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Merge and redirect to MIPS architecture. One can verify that the term MIPSel exists, but there are few sources beyond a definition. While there are not enough in-depth reliable sources to support saving this article, it is a term that users could search on. So following WP:PRESERVE, I suggest converting this to a redirect to MIPS architecture and adding the definition to the section MIPS architecture#CPU family where the bi-endian nature of the processor family is mentioned. --Mark viking (talk) 23:11, 22 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.