Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MH-60CZ Multi-Role Helicopter

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. May I suggest that there are more effective and time-honored ways of selling expensive weapons systems, such as suborning political leaders, rather than writing spammy Wikipedia articles? Sandstein 09:57, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

MH-60CZ Multi-Role Helicopter[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

lacks direct source(s) to the subject (nothing in a google search either), and appears to be more of an advertisement FOX 52 (talk) 20:15, 15 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Aviation-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 20:29, 15 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 20:34, 15 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - marketing fluff, promotional, advertising. No sources in article to even verify this is an existing proposal, even on company's own website. - BilCat (talk) 12:39, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete as advertising. Horribly written fluff. A cood does of copyediting woukld reduce this article to almost nothing.TheLongTone (talk) 12:49, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Seems to be WP:SPAM. - Ahunt (talk) 16:03, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I am working to include additional references to the MH-60CZ project. Many of them are in the Czech language but will be included for reference. This topic is notable and has been covered by many third-party, reliable sources. It is also verifiable. With regards to the quality of the writing, the article provides encyclopedic information of a quality equal to or better than similar articles covering other rotary wing platforms or programs. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Highlands47 (talk • contribs) 20:15, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please see new references for notability, verifiability, and credibility*** — Preceding unsigned comment added by Highlands47 (talk • contribs) 20:29, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete The added references make no specific notes and appear erroneous. Parts of the article stray off topic with Russia's involvement in Crimea and Surplus helicopters - FOX 52 (talk) 21:44, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@FOX 52: You are the nominator of the AFD, you don't need to !vote delete again. Jim Carter 20:41, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.