Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MENA WHRD Coalition

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Spartaz Humbug! 23:16, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

MENA WHRD Coalition[edit]

MENA WHRD Coalition (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I had prodded this article with reason "No independent reliable sources seem to discuss this organisation indepth, all we have are self-published sources and reprints of their statements and press releases. No better sources for "MENA WHRD Coalition" or "Regional Coalition of Women Human Rights Defenders" could be found. Fails WP:N."

Since then, some sources have been added[1], but none of these corrects the original problem.

There are no independent, reliable sources about this organisation; all we have are posts by members (like the posts from OpenDemocracy or Ghazal), press releases, and posts from connected organisations (other human rights organisations like "Worldwide Movement for Human Rights" or cihrs.org. Fram (talk) 07:20, 29 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. MT TrainTalk 11:24, 29 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sarahj2107 (talk) 21:13, 5 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. North America1000 06:28, 6 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 10:17, 13 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete: does not meet WP:NORG and significant RS coverage not found. This content belongs on the org's website, not here. K.e.coffman (talk) 22:54, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.