Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MC Vittumeitsi
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Yamamoto Ichiro (山本一郎)(会話) 03:46, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
MC Vittumeitsi[edit]
- MC Vittumeitsi (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
Laaaaaadies and gentt-lmen. May I present you the equivalent of GNAA in Finnish Wikipedia (think of "clearly more notable/less notable than MC Vittumeitsi"), finally deleted after three highly sparky deletion debates. However, I'm kind of hoping deleting this article here would not be quite as controversial as in fi.wikipedia; how this artist fulfills WP:MUSIC is somewhat shaky indeed. There's precious little online coverage; I get 173 distinct google hits for "MC Vittumeitsi" and 150 for "MC Vittumeitsi" -wikipedia. There's one single and one album, both from (what appears to be) very minor label that has a dead web page. Official home page appears dead as well. Online reviews of the music appear rather slim; Google-cached version of fi.wikipedia article didn't have print mentions and only mentioned four shows where this artist appeared, between 2003-2004. I admit I'm doing this on a kind of hokey grounds in that I haven't checked the offline availability, but the online presence seems extremely minimal and it doesn't appear to reliably confirm notability as per WP:MUSIC. wwwwolf (barks/growls) 15:37, 14 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Oh, and for the record, I argued for keeping the article in fi.wikipedia but after researching its visibility further, I'm not so sure anymore. Besides, en.wikipedia supposedly calls for much more verifiability. I'm not so sure it will materialise in this case; the claims of fame would be pretty weak if sources would materialise. --wwwwolf (barks/growls) 15:40, 14 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. as per nom. Rather than a transwiki, this surely fails to meet criteria of WP:CITE, WP:MUSIC, and WP:Notability.--Edtropolis 15:44, 14 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - The question of notability can be answered by whether or not the artist passes WP:MUSIC (or even WP:BIO). Chart success is the only apparent criterion that might be achieved. Otherwise, delete - Tiswas(t) 15:46, 14 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Not very well known but verifiable and notable enough. --Zzzzzzzzzz 22:28, 17 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.