Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MAX60 Cricket League

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. The delete views carry substantially more P&G-weight than the Keeps. Owen× ☎ 13:14, 28 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

MAX60 Cricket League

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Another non-notable T10 league, this time from the Cayman Islands. Fails WP:NCRIC and WP:GNG, alongside WP:EVENT. Notability of an event also isn't inherited just because current or former players are taking part. AA (talk) 23:08, 20 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Cricket-related deletion discussions. AA (talk) 23:08, 20 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations and Caribbean. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:03, 21 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: The article is well sourced. Multiple news organisations have reported on it. Changeworld1984 (talk) 11:15, 21 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Routine squad announcements? Zero in-depth coverage which demonstrates why this tournament is notable. It is being played in the Cayman Islands, one of the lowest ranked associate members of the ICC. Zero notability and would be surprised if A) it happens, B) it lasts more than a season. The list of notable cricket tournaments can be found here. You won't it on this list. AA (talk) 12:29, 21 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: It’s great to see that associate nations are stepping up their game. Pkr206 (talk) 01:52, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This isn't a reason to keep an article. AA (talk) 15:28, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete i think it doesn't have enough reliable sources to prove it's notable. Most references are not independent or detailed enough to show it's important. Yakov-kobi (talk) 13:54, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete only WP:ROUTINE coverage, not significant independent coverage to pass WP:GNG. Joseph2302 (talk) 19:05, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: passing mentions, no in depth coverage from reliable sources. Instant History (talk) 11:56, 26 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: Just to be clear, a sports league is a company or organization, so WP:NCORP is the notability threshold that needs to be met. Left guide (talk) 22:23, 26 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.