Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MARSEC-XL (3rd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 01:01, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

MARSEC-XL[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't meet WP:ORG. Got a flutter of coverage, mostly WP:CHURNALISM around the time it was established and basically nothing since. PepperBeast (talk) 13:25, 27 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Malta-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:15, 27 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Engineering-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:15, 27 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:16, 27 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 14:57, 3 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Extraordinary Writ (talk) 17:21, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete GNews finds a bit of coverage from Matla about it, most recently in 2013. I think it doesn't warrant an article based on the lack of coverage in reliable sources. Oaktree b (talk) 23:59, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Fails WP:GNG. As noted in the first AFD, sources are largely promotional press releases that lack independence.4meter4 (talk) 02:33, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, I couldn't find sufficient sources to show notability. Suonii180 (talk) 00:10, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.