Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MAODDP

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 20:11, 5 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

MAODDP[edit]

This article is original research. Evidence:

The article's subject, MAODDP, is referred to as a "research outcome" here
The article's author added this link to List of ad-hoc routing protocols. The link is a presentation of MAODDP as OR
When the author added MAODDP to List of ad-hoc routing protocols the summary was "Addition of new protocol details"

The article has already been deleted once before.

andy 22:12, 29 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete recreation of deleted material. --JianLi 22:23, 29 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete spam. JuJube 23:22, 29 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep if additional sources can be found. --164.107.223.217 00:12, 30 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment This anonymous user has voted Keep in every AfD he's voted in. JuJube 00:16, 30 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

So what? If I find one that I agree should be deleted, I promise that I will vote as such, but if I have a reason to keep, why not share it? Should I comment that you mostly vote to delete articles based on your recent history as evidence of something? --164.107.223.217 00:22, 30 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

delete unless the anon user above can find some sources, since he apparently thinks there might be some. DGG 04:27, 30 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.