Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MADE 2015 World Tour

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sam Walton (talk) 17:43, 16 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

MADE 2015 World Tour[edit]

MADE 2015 World Tour (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete or redirect Only a few concerts have been held so far on this tour and the impact of them is not mentioned at all. Most of the article is about the promotions for the concert itself the rest being a set list and concert dates. This tour may become relevant in the future but for now it is not and there is no way to speculate on its impact at this point. At this point the only thing this page is doing is promoting the concerts, it is not saying why they are important because for the most part they haven't been held yet. Also it lacks sources for most of that information as well. Peachywink (talk) 20:54, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:32, 1 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:32, 1 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Korea-related deletion discussions. Random86 (talk) 04:14, 1 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • I disagree with it being deleted. The tour has only just started but as seen by their last world tour, Big Bang Alive Galaxy Tour 2012, the tour is likely to attract attention from world press and other relevant information will surely be added as more shows are completed. It seems useless to delete the page now and re-add it later. In comparison, Taylor Swift's 1989 World Tour has not even commenced yet and it contains only a tour schedule, and other basic background information, yet it is not seen as being needed to be deleted. --EnderAtreides117 (talk) 03:10, 2 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I moved your comment down to where it normally would go, anyways all because another page has something or exist doesn't mean it should. There are not enough editors to patrol the whole of Wikipedia at this time. If the article is not classified as good on the quality scale then its not usable as an example for what to do. Personally I don't think she needs that page either yet, Wikipedia is an online encyclopedia and encyclopedias do not predict the future. However I concede the point that it's likely to become relevant in the future so will now lean more towards this page getting blanked for now and redirected.Peachywink (talk) 05:42, 2 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 (talk) 00:32, 8 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
KEEP I agree with EnderAtreides117 comments. The tour has just started. There will be more content once it gets rolling.Mikepellerintalk 03:12, 11 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per WP:NTOUR and the old crystal ball. Mikepellerin's comment seems to be based on the mistaken idea that a tour is notable because it happened, and because this party happened it should be wholly notable. That's not the case. Tours are notable if they generate reliable, in-depth coverage in secondary sources--coverage meaning coverage of the tour. That's not happening here. Drmies (talk) 17:53, 11 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Most of the article is speculative and there isn't any in-depth coverage of the tour. It may become more notable later on, so I suggest the page be userfied. Random86 (talk) 20:56, 11 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete: Way too soon for this article to exist. Also, seconding the third, fourth and fifth sentence from Drmies, and Random86. Tibbydibby (talk) 20:30, 15 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.