Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/M. S. Pillai

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 18:05, 25 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

M. S. Pillai[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The only source I can find is the linked official site which doesn't mention his recently-asserted death. It appears that he fails WP:PROF, however, even if he has recently died, BLP still applies to the recently deceased, and I don't think there's enough coverage to warrant an article. Opting for AFD over PROD to allow input from users who may speak languages in which better sources could exist. SITH (talk) 16:50, 4 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 17:09, 4 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 17:09, 4 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I can see a few sources - [1][2][3], at the moment I'm not sure that is sufficient, but if more turn up he may qualify under GNG. Hzh (talk) 17:05, 9 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:14, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Atlantic306 (talk) 16:36, 18 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as PROMO for the Sadhana Centre for Management & Leadership Development, an outfit about which I know absolutely nothing except that we do not have a page for it. Page was created by an SPA. It makes no claim to notability and has no sources and no links. It has been tagged for improvement since 2009. And while I appreciate Nom's impulse to await someone who speaks the language, everyone in India with a high school education knows English, and there will be exceedingly few notable figures in India who cannot be sourced in English.E.M.Gregory (talk) 18:26, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Everything I can find about him connects to SCMHRD and SCMLD, which he founded. I was unable to find the independent coverage needed to show that WP:GNG is met. My search in Google Scholar found more than one M.S. Pillai, but the others were in chemistry or medicine. I did not find anything to show me that WP:NPROF, or any other SNG, is met. Papaursa (talk) 17:37, 23 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.