Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mërgim Hereqi

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Fenix down (talk) 23:29, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Mërgim Hereqi

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Meets the ludicrous WP:NFOOTBALL due to a one-minute substitute appearance in an alleged 'fully professional league' 12 years ago. The rest of his football career has progressed at a much lower level and there is a lack of sustained, non-routine coverage to meet WP:GNG. Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 23:27, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 23:29, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 23:29, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Norway-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 23:29, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 09:15, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - there is longstanding consensus that scraping by on NFOOTBALL with one appearance is insufficient when GNG is failed comprehensively, as is the case here. If sources are found please ping me. Giant Snowman 10:55, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Deleteper GiantSnowman and guidelines failure. Less Unless (talk) 19:15, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - meets NFOOTBALL by skin of teeth only and almost zero coverage in searches so fails WP:GNG and, on balance, should be deleted Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 23:08, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.