Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lyra Health

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. See last comment --Anar chyte 03:32, 23 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Lyra Health[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG; no indication of importance. WP:CCOS. --Anar chyte 04:27, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comment:I admittedly have a COI as Lyra Health's CTO. But I think the notability is clear from the extensive coverage of the company's launch in Re/code, Financial Times, Wall Street Journal, Bloomberg Businessweek, and San Francisco Business Times. There was a lot of public anticipation and speculation as to what former Facebook and Genentech CFO David Ebersman would do next, and the launch of Lyra Health is newsworthy as a result. --Dtunkelang (talk) 04:35, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Dtunkelang: In the article, all there is is the Re/Code mention, could you please list (in this nomination) those other websites that covered Lyra Health? --Anar chyte 04:56, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Anarchyte: Here is further coverage beyond the Re/Code article: Former Facebook honcho’s new startup aims to fix mental health system (San Francisco Business Times), Facebook Ex-Finance Chief Starts Behavioral Health-Care Company (Bloomberg Business), Former Facebook CFO David Ebersman launches Lyra Health (Pando Daily), The Daily Startup (Wall Street Journal), Health tech start-ups target internet talent (Financial Times), Society stands to be winner in the race for digital health (Financial Times). --Dtunkelang (talk) 05:12, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:33, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:33, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:33, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy keep: I'm retracting this AfD. --Anar chyte 10:22, 22 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Anarchyte: What's the next step in this process? The page is still marked as being considered for deletion, and my removal of the tag was reverted. -- Dtunkelang (talk) 03:24, 23 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.