Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lynx Gang
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. The Bushranger One ping only 01:56, 14 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Lynx Gang (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Not notable, refs are all about one member of the gang that became notable for another issue, notability is not inherited. PROD declined without change to article. GregJackP Boomer! 23:42, 6 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:31, 7 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:31, 7 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:31, 7 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- delete I was unable to find sources which evidence notability under WP:GNG. --j⚛e deckertalk 17:41, 8 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete the gang does not pass WP:CRIME. --Vic49 (talk) 23:10, 9 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. The gang lacks substantial coverage by reliable sources. • Gene93k (talk) 01:21, 10 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as above. Stuartyeates (talk) 09:23, 11 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete -- I cannot believe that a street gang, even if formed to oppose the skinheads is (or was) notable. Peterkingiron (talk) 17:38, 11 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment There has been sock-puppetry (CU confirmed, see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/La Cosa Nostra786) in the article history, but does not seem to have had any substantive effect on the content since prior to when it apparently began. I'm now wondering if the PROD-remover(s) are also part of that drawer. DMacks (talk) 23:08, 11 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete It does not meet both GNG and CRIME. — ΛΧΣ21™ 00:50, 14 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.