Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lynne Austin
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. The Bushranger One ping only 05:56, 3 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Lynne Austin (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Subject doesn't seem notable, and the article does not have any RS Fasttimes68 (talk) 03:02, 27 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Well, maybe Hooters magazine IS a RS after all? I thought it was a joke, but apparently it is a real publication.Fasttimes68 (talk) 12:27, 27 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:13, 27 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:13, 27 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - Google news search reveals several RS covering her life as the first hooters girl and her marriage to Daulton. Morbidthoughts (talk) 23:56, 31 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Based on the exhausting/ive debates over Playmate notability a while back, she merits an individual entry by a narrow margin. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 02:15, 1 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per Hullaballoo Wolfowitz. Unless one is questioning whether a particular individual merits a separate article (like this one) or whether the content should be put in the corresponding year article, another round playmate AfDs is really not an efficient use of our time.--Milowent • hasspoken 01:26, 2 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.