Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lynda Suzanne Robinson

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Consensus is clear at this point. BD2412 T 14:06, 10 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Lynda Suzanne Robinson[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Conducted BEFORE search and found no SIRS. Fails GNG and NAUTHOR. voorts (talk/contributions) 21:09, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Authors, Women, and Texas. Shellwood (talk) 22:20, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: No book reviews that I can find, does not seem to pass AUTHOR or GNG. Oaktree b (talk) 01:05, 4 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. I found three reviews on Publishers Weekly under the name Suzanne Robinson (See 1, 2, and 3) and 6 more under the name Lynda S. Robinson (see search list here). Likewise, Kirkus lists 7 reviews under Lynda S. Robinson (see search list here) while the New York Times lists 5 reviews plus an essay mentioning her. In addition, using the Wikipedia Library I found a ton of reviews in places like Magill's Book Reviews, Booklist, Wall Street Journal, and Library Journal along with biographies for this author in reference works such as Baker & Taylor Author Biographies and Guide to Literary Masters & Their Works. Per WP:Author, Lynda Suzanne Robinson easily meets our notability guidelines.--SouthernNights (talk) 11:59, 4 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per SouthernNights. St Anselm (talk) 16:07, 4 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per SouthernNights, and note there were clear references to multiple reviews already present in the article at the time of prod & AfD. It would be easy to stub the article to remove the promotion. Espresso Addict (talk) 20:48, 4 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep but strip out or source the completely unsourced biographical content. Some seems based on / copied from her archived web page here. PamD 07:28, 5 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, as per SouthernNights. Suonii180 (talk) 11:05, 5 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Changing to keep per SouthernNights. voorts (talk/contributions) 00:09, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: I have now cleaned up the article to remove the fluff and also added new citations.--SouthernNights (talk) 12:57, 8 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per SouthernNights.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 10:35, 10 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.