Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Luxury Goods Index

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy deleted as WP:A11. Just Chilling (talk) 20:49, 29 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Luxury Goods Index

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The Luxury Goods Index (aka Rolex Index) appears to be made up, possibly by the author User:Rolexindex; I have certainly found no evidence of this anywhere other than here and it appears to be non-notable. Standard & Poor's have a Luxury Goods Index so possibly this could redirect to the article but as there's no mention of it there I suggest we simply delete. RichardOSmith (talk) 19:34, 29 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Not notable. No mention of this index found, no mention found of the supposed inventor. Could even be a speedy delete on made up grounds. It is not the same as the Standard and Poor's index (which looks at companies producing luxury goods rather than countries likely to consume luxury goods) so it should not be a redirect to that article. Meters (talk) 19:50, 29 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete under criterion A11 as made up, especially given that the user name is the same as one of the names given for the index. I'm inclined to think this is a new invention, so if we don't speedy delete, it should still be deleted as unreferenced original research. —C.Fred (talk) 19:56, 29 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.